Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods in Employee Award Ranking

Roznim binti Mohamad Rasli(1), Mesran Mesran(2*), Ridha Maya Faza Lubis(3),

(1) Sultan Idris Education University, Perak
(2) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma Medan, Medan
(3) Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Awards are an important form of appreciation for outstanding employees, but the process of selecting recipients is often faced with various challenges, especially in assessing subjective aspects of performance. To overcome this, the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method can be an effective solution. MCDM offers a systematic framework for evaluating various alternatives (in this case, employees) based on a number of relevant criteria. By using the MCDM method, the process of selecting award recipients can be carried out more objectively and transparently. Some commonly used MCDM methods, such as MAUT, OCRA, and CoCoSo, have their own advantages and disadvantages. This study aims to compare the three methods specifically in the context of selecting employee award recipients. The final results obtained show that the best alternative is A6, where the results of the three methods look the same position or location in the ranking. After a comparative analysis of the three methods, it can be concluded that the OCRA method is the best method in terms of ranking consistency compared to the other two methods. Thus, it is hoped that recommendations for the most suitable MCDM method can be obtained to be applied in similar situations

Keywords


DSS; MCDM; MAUT Method; OCRA Method; CoCoSo Method

Full Text:

PDF

References


R. Fadillah, A. N. Purnama, W. P. Mahardika, and M. Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Siaran Edukasi di Televisi Menggunakan Metode WASPAS (Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment),” JIKTEKS J. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 8–16, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.faatuatua.com/index.php/JIKTEKS/article/view/11

A. A. Nasution, R. T. Aldisa, M. Mesran, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode Multi Objective Optimization on The Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dalam Penentuan Pembimbing Skripsi Terbaik,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 614–620, 2024, doi: 10.47065/josh.v5i2.4803.

I. Alfansyah, J. Sibagariang, R. Fadillah, and D. Assarani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Dosen Non Komputer Terbaik Menerapkan Metode SAW,” J. Decis. Support Syst. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2023, doi: doi.org/10.64366/dss.v1i1.6.

M. Z. Lubis, Ruziana, R. Fadillah, and R. M. F. Lubis, “Decision Support System for Determining New Branch Locations Applying the Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Method,” Int. J. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2023, doi: 10.64366/ijids.v1i1.17.

M. Mesran, A. A. Kusuma, and R. M. F. Lubis, “Decision Support System for Determining New Branch Location Applying the MAUT Method with ROC Weighting,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 67–76, 2024, doi: 10.61944/bids.v2i2.76.

R. A. Pratama and R. Hardianto, “Permanent Employee Assessment Decision Support System using the Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) Method,” J. Comput. Scine Inf. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 50–54, 2024, doi: 10.35134/jcsitech.v10i2.100.

S. Zega and M. Mesran, “Pharmacist Acceptance Decision Support System Applying AHP and COPRAS Methods,” Int. J. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–35, 2023, doi: 10.64366/ijids.v1i1.15.

M. N. D. Satria, “Application of SAW in the Class Leader Selection Decision Support System,” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.58602/chain.v1i1.7.

A. Yusupa, J. Manullang, N. Marbun, and S. B. F. Ginting, “Decision support system for determining the best PAUD teacher using the MOORA method,” SAGA J. Technol. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 50–55, 2023, doi: 10.58905/saga.v1i2.101.

R. Alfiansyah and I. Zufria, “Decision Support Systems for Career Recommendations for Graduates in Islamic Broadcasting Communication Studies Using ANP and TOPSIS Methods,” Int. J. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 474–486, 2023, doi: ijsecs.v3i3.1914.

Y. Nur, K. M. Hindrayani, and A. T. Damaliana, “Optimasi Elastic Net Regression dengan Optuna untuk Analisis Faktor Kemiskinan di Indonesia,” JATI(Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 8583–8590, 2025, doi: 10.36040/jati.v9i5.15179.

K. D. Putri, A. P. Juledi, and I. R. Munthe, “Perancangan Aplikasi SPK Penerimaaan Tenaga Kerja Honorer dengan Menggunakan Metode MAUT,” MEANS (Media Inf. Anal. dan Sist., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 48–56, 2023, doi: 10.54367/means.v8i1.2565.

B. Sentiani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerapan Metode OCRA dalam Seleksi Penerima Bantuan Penduduk Miskin dengan Pembobotan ROC,” J. Informatics, Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 124–130, 2023, doi: 10.47065/jieee.v2i4.905.

A. Ardinsah, M. Mesran, and A. Triayudi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Aplikasi Chat Terbaik Menggunakan Metode OCRA Dengan Pembobotan ROC,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 891–898, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i4.3467.

J. Marito, W. B. Nainggolan, and G. S. Mahendra, “Penerapan Metode Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) dalam Pemilihan Franchise Minuman,” J. Teknol. Terpadu, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2024, doi: 10.54914/jtt.v10i1.1183.

H. Pasaribu and N. Y. L. Gaol, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Karyawan bagian Keperawatan Dengan Metode Cocoso,” J. Sist. Inf. Triguna Dharma (JURSI TGD), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 391–399, 2024, doi: 10.53513/jursi.v3i3.10097.

S. Zulvianty, T. Handayani, and A. Sellyana, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa Cendikia Baznas (BCB) Kota Dumai Menggunakan Metode Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo),” JUTEKINF (Jurnal Teknol. Komput. dan Informasi), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 56–69, 2024, doi: 10.52072/jutekinf.v12i1.644.

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MAUT Dalam Rekrutmen Kepala Gudang di Perusahaan Dengan Pembobotan ROC,” KLIK, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1073–1079, 2023, doi: 10.30865/klik.v4i2.1323.

I. M. Pandiangan, M. Mesran, R. I. Borman, A. P. Windarto, and S. Setiawansyah, “Implementation of Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) and Rank Order Centroid (ROC) to Determination of Minimarket Location,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2023, doi: 10.61944/bids.v2i1.62.

A. F. O. Pasaribu, A. A. Aldino, and A. Surahman, “Decision Support System for Determining the Best Internship Students Using the Combined Compromise Solution Method,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 607–618, 2024, doi: 10.47065/bits.v5i3.4231.

T. A. Munandar, “Perangkingan Pegawai Untuk Menentukan Penerima Bonus Akhir Tahun Menggunakan Teknik ELECTRE Pada BPR Rasyid,” J. Inform. J. Pengemb. IT, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 82–88, 2023, doi: 10.30591/jpit.v8i2.4882.

J. Afriany, K. Tampubolon, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Penentuan Pemberian Mikro Faedah Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–137, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ejurnal.seminar-id.com/index.php/tin/article/view/840

A. Arman, T. A. Sundara, I. Stephane, and M. Fadli, “SPK Penilihan Guru Terbaik Dengan Metode WP Pada MAN 1 Pariaman,” J. Khatulistiwa Inform., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 310–321, 2019, doi: 10.31294/ji.v6i2.6176.

A. Triayudi, D. Nofrisa, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode EXPROM II Dalam Menentukan Tempat Wisata Pantai Terbaik,” J. Sist. Komput. Dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 337–346, 2023, doi: 10.30865/json.v5i2.6925.

D. Aldo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( Maut ),” JURSIMA (Jurnal Sist. Inf. dan Manajemen), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 76–82, 2019, doi: 10.47024/js.v7i2.180.

N. Rivaldy, D. Irmayanti, and M. Defriani, “Perancangan SPK Kelayakan Pinjaman Koperasi Karyawan Perum Jasa Tirta Karya Bhakti Raharja dengan Metode MAUT,” J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komput. dan Inform., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 172–181, 2023, doi: 10.30645/j-sakti.v7i1.581.

J. Faran and R. T. Aldisa, “Implementasi Metode MAUT dengan Menerapkan Pembobotan ROC Dalam Pemilihan Ketua Himpunan Mahasiswa,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1315–1322, 2023, doi: 10.30865/mib.v7i3.6471.

R. W. Dari, S. Sapriadi, N. A. Rahmi, and P. A. W. Purnama, “Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mobil Bekas,” J. KomtekInfo, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 73–79, 2023, doi: 10.35134/komtekinfo.v10i2.378.

N. T. L.Toruan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pembawa Acara Berita Terbaik Menerapkan Metode OCRA,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 71–78, 2021, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v1i3.120.

N. Oktari, D. P. Utomo, S. Aripin, and A. Karim, “Penerapan Metode Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) Dalam Penerimaan Karyawan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT),” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 218–226, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josh.v3i3.1471.

R. Y. Amanda, H. Winata, and S. Kusnasari, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Employee Salary Increase Menggunakan Metode OCRA,” J. Sist. Inf. Triguna Dharma (JURSI TGD), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 460–469, 2023, doi: 10.53513/jursi.v2i3.7817.

B. K. Wijaya, I. G. I. Sudipa, D. V. Waas, and P. P. Santika, “Selection of Online Sales Platforms for MSMEs using the OCRA Method with ROC Weighting,” J. Intell. Decis. Support Syst., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 146–152, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://idss.iocspublisher.org/index.php/jidss/article/view/113

Ismawati, P. A. Cakranegara, A. Budiastuti, Kurniawansyah, and T. M. Simanjorang, “Determining the Company Marketing Sales Perfomance Using the Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) Method,” Enrich. J. Manag., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 3996–4002, 2022, doi: 10.35335/enrichment.v12i5.986.

S. H. Hadad, D. Darwis, A. Qurania, A. A. Aldino, and A. R. Mehta, “Student Ranking Based on Learning Assessment Using the Simplified PIPRECIA Method and CoCoSo Method,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v5i1.4544.

D. K. Tripathi, S. K. Nigam, and P. Rani, “New intuitionistic fuzzy parametric divergence measures and score function-based CoCoSo method for decision-making problems,” Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 535–563, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame0318102022t.

J. Yu, H. Ding, Y. Yu, S. Wu, Q. Zeng, and Y. Xu, “Risk assessment of liquefied natural gas storage tank leakage using failure mode and effects analysis with Fermatean fuzzy sets and CoCoSo method,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 154, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111334.

K. K. Panchagnula, J. P. Sharma, K. Kalita, and S. Chakraborty, “CoCoSo method-based optimization of cryogenic drilling on multi-walled carbon nanotubes reinforced composites,” Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 279–297, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00894-1.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61944/bids.v5i1.141

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Roznim binti Mohamad Rasli, Mesran Mesran, Ridha Maya Faza Lubis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science
Asosiasi Peneliti Data Science Indonesia
Email: pdsi.bids@gmail.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.