Hybrid Chaos-Isolation Forest Framework for Anomaly Detection in Indonesia’s Public Procurement
(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, DKI Jakarta
(2) Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Riau Pesisir, Riau
(3) Universitas Pamulang, South Tangerang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study proposes and empirically evaluates a Hybrid Chaos-Isolation Forest (HC-iForest) framework for detecting anomalies in Indonesia’s public procurement datasets. The purpose of this research is to address the difficulty of identifying irregular procurement patterns, as existing assessment mechanisms remain largely descriptive and retrospective. The framework integrates chaos-based temporal descriptors—permutation entropy, turning points, and volatility—with statistical indicators to enhance sensitivity to nonlinear and irregular time series. Using monthly procurement data from the Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) covering the period from 2019 to 2024, the model identified anomalous fiscal patterns associated with year-end budget adjustments and procurement surges. Empirical evaluation using correlation, ablation, and statistical validation shows that the hybrid model introduces non-redundant anomaly information, achieving a Spearman rank correlation of approximately 0.75 compared to the baseline Isolation Forest, with reduced overlap at intermediate thresholds (Jaccard similarity of 0.20 at the Top 5%). These results confirm that chaos-driven features improve model stability and interpretability. The findings reveal that anomalies are systemic manifestations of institutional and fiscal behavior rather than random deviations. The HC-iForest framework offers a data-driven early-warning mechanism for oversight agencies such as LKPP and ICW, strengthening transparency and accountability in public spending. Future studies may extend this framework through neural or spatiotemporal hybrid architectures to support intelligent and adaptive fiscal monitoring systems
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
D. P. Senopati Warga Dalam, W. Prawesthi, and S. Marwiyah, “Prevention of Corruption in the Procurement of Goods/Services Process at PT PAL Indonesia Based on Regulations in Indonesia,” American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 99–106, 2025
I. Suardi, H. Rossieta, C. Djakman, and V. Diyanty, “Procurement governance in reducing corruption in the indonesian public sector: a mixed method approach,” Cogent Business and Management, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2393744, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2393744.
R. Anggriawan, “From Collusion to Corruption: How Indonesian Law Fights Back in Procurement Conspiracy,” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 66–81, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.18196/jphk.v6i1.24577.
A. Firmansyah, R. Y. Maulana, and A. Z. Miftah, “Transformation of the Procurement System in the Indonesian Government,” Sosiohumaniora, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 369–381, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v26i2.56209.
X. Tan, J. Yang, and S. Rahardja, “Sparse random projection isolation forest for outlier detection,” Pattern Recognit Lett, vol. 163, pp. 65–73, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2022.09.015.
F. T. Liu, K. M. Ting, and Z.-H. Zhou, “Isolation-Based Anomaly Detection,” ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–39, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1145/2133360.2133363.
C. Zheng, Y. Chen, and X. Du, “A robust soft voting ensemble of the isolation forest model, extended isolation forest model and generalized isolation forest model for multivariate geochemical anomaly recognition,” Ore Geol Rev, vol. 185, p. 106787, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106787.
X. Chen, T. Weng, C. Li, and H. Yang, “Equivalence of machine learning models in modeling chaos,” Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 165, p. 112831, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112831.
S. Sheng and X. Wang, “Network traffic anomaly detection method based on chaotic neural network,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 77, pp. 567–579, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.07.019.
W. S. Al Farizi, I. Hidayah, and M. N. Rizal, “Isolation Forest Based Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Literature Review,” in 2021 8th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE), 2021, pp. 118–122. doi: 10.1109/ICITACEE53184.2021.9617498.
G. Wang, D. Wei, X. Li, and N. Wang, “A novel method for local anomaly detection of time series based on multi entropy fusion,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 615, p. 128593, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128593.
C. Bandt and B. Pompe, “Permutation Entropy: A Natural Complexity Measure for Time Series,” Phys Rev Lett, vol. 88, no. 17, p. 174102, Apr. 2002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.174102.
J. S. Richman and J. R. Moorman, “Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 278, no. 6, pp. H2039–H2049, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.6.H2039.
K. Blagov, C. E. Muñiz-Cuza, and M. Boehm, “Fast, Parameter-free Time Series Anomaly Detection,” in Datenbanksysteme für Business, Technologie und Web (BTW 2025), Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn, 2025, pp. 453–474. doi: 10.18420/BTW2025-21.
P. Wiessner, G. Bezirganyan, S. Sellami, R. Chbeir, and H.-J. Bungartz, “Uncertainty-Aware Time Series Anomaly Detection,” Future Internet, vol. 16, no. 11, p. 403, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/fi16110403.
Y. Feng, Y. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Out‐of‐sample volatility prediction: Rolling window, expanding window, or both?,” J Forecast, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 567–582, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1002/for.3046.
J. Olbryś, “Entropy of Volatility Changes: Novel Method for Assessment of Regularity in Volatility Time Series,” Entropy, vol. 27, no. 3, p. 318, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/e27030318.
H. Xu, G. Pang, Y. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Deep Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detection,” IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 12591–12604, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2023.3270293.
A. Arcudi, D. Frizzo, C. Masiero, and G. A. Susto, “Enhancing interpretability and generalizability in extended isolation forests,” Eng Appl Artif Intell, vol. 138, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109409.
H. Xiang et al., “OptIForest: Optimal Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detection,” in Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, Aug. 2023, pp. 2379–2387. doi: 10.24963/ijcai.2023/264.
A. Barredo Arrieta et al., “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI,” Information Fusion, vol. 58, pp. 82–115, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61944/bids.v4i2.137
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Erlin Windia Ambarsari, Desyanti Desyanti, Dedin Fathudin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science
Asosiasi Peneliti Data Science Indonesia
Email: pdsi.bids@gmail.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
