Decision Support System for Student Exchange Selection in Support of Independent Campus using the MAUT and ROC Methods

Hetty Rohayani(1), Zaza Mutiara Arini(2*), Kelik Sussolaikah(3), Syahrull Hi Fi Syam(4),

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi, Jambi
(2) Budi Darma University, Medan
(3) PGRI Madiun University, Madiun
(4) Tuanku Syed Sirajuddin Polytechnic, Perlis
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Independent campus is an off-campus learning activity as an opportunity for students to hone skills in preparation for entering the world of work. One of the programs held is the exchange of students to be able to study on campuses or companies that join the Ministry of Education and Culture, Research and Technology. With the current independent campus program, almost all universities open up opportunities for students to register. However, because there are too many students who register, the campus has difficulty in choosing some students who can be accepted according to the criteria set by the party. For this reason, a Decision Support System is needed that applies the MAUT method along with the use of ROC to produce the best preference value. The calculation of several data samples resulted in the best final utility value in the selection of independent campus student exchanges in Alternative A2 with the best final utility value of 0.9700

Keywords


Independent Campus; Student Exchange; MAUT Method; ROC Method; DSS

Full Text:

PDF

References


M. R. Baharuddin, “Adaptasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (Fokus: Model MBKM Program Studi),” J. Stud. Guru dan Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 195–205, 2021.

E. Purwanti, “ Preparing the Implementation of Merdeka Belajar – Kampus Merdeka Policy in Higher Education Institutions ,” vol. 518, no. ICoSIHESS 2020, pp. 384–391, 2021, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210120.149.

R. N. Anwar, “Pelaksanaan Kampus Mengajar Angkatan 1 Program Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Pendidik. Dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 210–219, 2021, doi: 10.47668/pkwu.v9i1.221.

A. Alinezhad and J. Khalili, ANP Method, vol. 277. 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15009-9_17.

D. P. Indini and A. Triayudi, “Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Penentuan Alat Bantu Media Pembelajaran Fisika Terbaik Menggunakan Metode PSI,” vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 861–871, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i4.3466.

F. Alwali Daini Udda Siregar, Nelly Astuti Hasibuan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Sales Marketing Terbaik di PT. Alfa Scorph Menggunakan Metode COPRAS,” Creat. Inf. Technol. J., vol. 2, pp. 62–68, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.30865/json.v2i1.2455.

H. Lubis, R. Salkiawati, and S. Hala, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Untuk Penerimaan Bantuan Langsung Tunai Dana Desa,” JSI (Jurnal Sist. Informasi) Univ. Suryadarma, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://journal.universitassuryadarma.ac.id/index.php/jsi/article/view/842

T. S. Pamungkas and A. Kusumaningrum, “Implementasi Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Aspek Penilaian Kedisiplinan Dosen,” no. 1, pp. 27–38, 2023.

A. Triayudi, J. D. Rajagukguk, and M. Mesran, “Implementasi Metode MAUT Dalam Menentukan Prioritas Produk Unggulan Daerah Dengan Menerapkan Pembobotan ROC,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 452–460, 2022.

P. Pristiwanto, H. Sunandar, and B. Nadeak, “Penerapan Metode MAUT Terhadap Perkembangan Metaverse Untuk Media Pembelajaran Daring Dengan Pembobotan ROC,” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 100–107, 2023.

D. N. Sholihaningtias, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode MAUT dan ROC Dalam Seleksi Karyawan,” Techno. Com, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 145–155, 2023.

D. H. Ramadan, M. R. Siregar, and S. R. Siregar, “Penerapan Metode MAUT Dalam Penentuan Kelayakan TKI dengan Pembobotan ROC,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1789–1795, 2022.

I. Oktaria, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023.

Autoridad Nacional del Servicio Civil, “MERDEKA BELAJAR KAMPUS MERDEKA (MBKM): INVENTARISASI MITRA DALAM PELAKSANAAN MAGANG MAHASISWA FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN Dian,” Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 6(11), 951–952., no. 1, pp. 2013–2015, 2021.

K. Krishnapatria, “Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) curriculum in English studies program: Challenges and opportunities,” ELT Focus, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 2021, doi: 10.35706/eltinfc.v4i1.5276.

R. T. Utami, D. Andreswari, and Y. Setiawan, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dengan pembobotan Rank Order Centroid(ROC) Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Untuk Seleksu Jasa Leasing Mobil,” J. Rekursif, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 209–221, 2016.

Mesran and D. P. Indini, “Analisis Dalam Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Content Creator Mahasiswa Terbaik Menerapkan Metode EDAS dan ROC,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 912–921, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i4.4093.

F. Mahdi, Faisal, D. P. Indini, and Mesran, “Penerapan Metode WASPAS dan ROC ( Rank Order Centroid ) dalam Pengangkatan Karyawan Kontrak,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 2023, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v3i2.232.

D. P. Indini, K. Khairunnisa, N. D. Puspa, T. A. Siregar, M. Mesran, and M. Kom, “Penerapan Metode OCRA dalam Menentukan Media Pembelajaran Online Terbaik di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dengan Pembobotan ROC,” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 60–66, 2021.

R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapaan Metode TOPSIS dengan Pembobotan ROC dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Auditor Internal Perusahaan,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 7, no. April, pp. 828–836, 2023, doi: 10.30865/mib.v7i2.5899.

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Implementasi Metode MAUT dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Stock Keeper Restoran dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1422–1430, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2656.

D. N. Sholihaningtias, “Rekomendasi Kelayakan Penerima Kredit Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS dengan Pembobotan ROC,” J. SAINTEKOM, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 88–99, 2023.

M. I. Nasution, A. Fadlil, and S. Sunardi, “Perbandingan Metode Smart dan Maut untuk Pemilihan Karyawan pada Merapi Online Corporation,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 6, p. 1205, 2021, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.2021863583.

R. T. Aldisa, S. Sanwani, D. M. Simanjuntak, S. Laia, and M. Mesran, “Penerapan Metode Metode Multy Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dalam Pemilihan Asisten Laboratorium Komputer,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 1782, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i3.4171.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61944/bids.v2i2.80

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Hetty Rohayani, Zaza Mutiara Arini, Kelik Sussolaikah, Syahrull Hi Fi Syam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science
Asosiasi Peneliti Data Science Indonesia
Email: pdsi.bids@gmail.com
This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.