Decision Support System for Determining New Branch Location Applying the MAUT Method with ROC Weighting

Mesran Mesran(1*), Ade Ayunda Kusuma(2), Ridha Maya Faza Lubis(3),

(1) Budi Darma University, Medan
(2) Budi Darma University, Medan
(3) Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The new branch location is close to people's activities with the availability of adequate facilities, making it convenient for consumers to access the services/products they need. The determination of the feasibility of a new branch location by several product or service producers still uses an inaccurate system, which can lead to problems in determining a strategic and targeted new branch location. However, there are some challenges in selecting a new branch location, so the utilization of technology is considered efficient, easy, and flexible, widely used by entrepreneurs, especially in determining new branch locations. This is done by using the assistance of a decision support system, which is expected to help determine an efficient and strategic new branch location. The aid comes in the form of a Decision Support System using the MAUT method with ROC weighting. After calculating each criterion and alternative, the best ranking is obtained for alternative A6 with a value of 0.6847. This way, business groups will not have difficulty in determining a new branch location through alternatives and criteria. The use of the MAUT method with ROC weighting is expected to assist in obtaining the best and valid alternatives up to the ranking stage

Keywords


DSS; New Branch Location; MAUT Method; ROC Method

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Giawa, P. S. Ramadhan, and A. Calam, “Penentuan Lokasi Cabang Baru Swalayan Menggunakan Preference Selection Index (PSI),” J. Sist. Inf. Triguna Dharma (JURSI TGD), vol. 1, no. 2, p. 98, 2022, doi: 10.53513/jursi.v1i2.5104.

R. T. Aldisa, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode ROC-WASPAS dan Entropy-WASPAS dalam Keputusan Pemberian Reward Kinerja Pegawai Hotel,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1212–1223, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2562.

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Perbandingan Metode Preference Selection Index dan Kombinasi Preference Selection Index dan TOPSIS dalam Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Hotel,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1080–1087, 2023, doi: 10.30865/klik.v3i6.960.

R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MABAC dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Aplikasi Pemesanan Hotel Terbaik,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 191–201, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josh.v4i1.2415.

M. Marbun and B. Sinaga, Buku Ajar Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Hasil Belajar | 1 STMIK Pelita Nusantara Medan, vol. 0, no. April. 2018.

L. Bidoux, J. P. Pignon, and F. Bénaben, “Planning with preferences using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory along with a Choquet Integral,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 85, no. August, pp. 808–817, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.08.002.

R. Addenan and W. Susanti, “Penerapan Metode Rank Order Centroid dan Additive Ratio Assessment Pada Aplikasi Rekomendasi Supplier,” Edumatic J. Pendidik. Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2021, doi: 10.29408/edumatic.v5i1.3252.

W. Harry, B. Lumban, R. Adrian, F. S. Simanjuntak, and K. Yudha, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Penerima Bantuan UKT Dengan Menerapkan Metode ROC dan MAUT,” pp. 15–21, 2021.

J. S. Komputer, J. D. Rajagukguk, B. Purba, P. T. Informatika, and B. Darma, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode ROC Dan MAUT Dalam Penentuan Calon Penerima Bantuan UKT Pada Universitas Budi Darma,” vol. 6, no. September, pp. 1193–1206, 2022.

D. H. Ramadan, M. R. Siregar, and S. R. Siregar, “Penerapan Metode MAUT Dalam Penentuan Kelayakan TKI dengan Pembobotan ROC,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1789–1795, 2022.

Z. M. Arini, D. J. Sitanggang, M. Ali, and S. Aripin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Facial Wash Terbaik yang digunakan pada kulit berminyak dengan menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ) dan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid ( ROC ),” pp. 317–324, 2022.

H. R. Hatta, B. Pradana, and D. M. Khairina, “Kombinasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) pada Lomba Balita Sehat untuk Usia 6-24 Bulan,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Sist. Inf. dan Teknol. ke 4 Tahun 2020, pp. 244–249, 2020.

S. Hutagalung, D. S. Gea, D. P. Indini, and Mesran, “Penerapan Metode MOORA Dalam Pemilihan Bimbingan Belajar Terbaik,” J. Informatics Manag. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2023.

R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapaan Metode TOPSIS dengan Pembobotan ROC dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Auditor Internal Perusahaan,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 7, no. April, pp. 828–836, 2023, doi: 10.30865/mib.v7i2.5899.

P. Purwadi, W. R. Maya, and A. Calam, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Pemasangan Lokasi Strategis Wifi.Id Pada Telkom (Studi Kasus Pada Pemsangan Wifi.Id Di Beberapa Lokasi Medan Menggunakan Metode Oreste,” J. SAINTIKOM (Jurnal Sains Manaj. Inform. dan Komputer), vol. 19, no. 1, p. 110, 2020, doi: 10.53513/jis.v19i1.231.

A. I. Lubis, P. Sihombing, and E. B. Nababan, “Comparison SAW and MOORA Methods with Attribute Weighting Using Rank Order Centroid in Decision Making,” Mecn. 2020 - Int. Conf. Mech. Electron. Comput. Ind. Technol., pp. 127–131, 2020, doi: 10.1109/MECnIT48290.2020.9166640.

D. P. Indini, K. Khairunnisa, N. D. Puspa, T. A. Siregar, M. Mesran, and M. Kom, “Penerapan Metode OCRA dalam Menentukan Media Pembelajaran Online Terbaik di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dengan Pembobotan ROC,” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 60–66, 2021.

F. Mahdi, Faisal, D. P. Indini, and Mesran, “Penerapan Metode WASPAS dan ROC ( Rank Order Centroid ) dalam Pengangkatan Karyawan Kontrak,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 2023, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v3i2.232.

Mesran and D. P. Indini, “Analisis Dalam Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Content Creator Mahasiswa Terbaik Menerapkan Metode EDAS dan ROC,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 912–921, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i4.4093.

A. Iskandar, “Penyeleksian Penerimaan Teleservice Representative dengan Penerapan Metode ARAS dan Pembobotan ROC,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 548–557, 2023.

M. L. O. Mardin, A. Fuad, and H. K. Sirajuddin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Perumahan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory,” J. Ilm. Ilk. - Ilmu Komput. Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 85–92, 2021, doi: 10.47324/ilkominfo.v4i2.129.

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Implementasi Metode MAUT dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Stock Keeper Restoran dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1422–1430, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2656.

A. Triayudi, J. D. Rajagukguk, and M. Mesran, “Implementasi Metode MAUT Dalam Menentukan Prioritas Produk Unggulan Daerah Dengan Menerapkan Pembobotan ROC,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 452–460, 2022.

I. Oktaria, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023.

S. Fajarika, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Balita Sehat Se-Kecamatan Sei Lepan Menggunakan Metode Multi Atributte Utility Theory (Maut) (Studi Kasus: Puskesmas Desa Lama),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 515–521, 2019, doi: 10.30865/komik.v3i1.1635.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61944/bids.v2i2.76

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Mesran Mesran, Ade Ayunda Kusuma, Ridha Maya Faza Lubis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science
Asosiasi Peneliti Data Science Indonesia
Email: pdsi.bids@gmail.com
This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.