Applying IROC Method in Patent Submission Evaluation in Indonesia: A Comparison with MAGIQ and AHP
(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, DKI Jakarta
(2) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, DKI Jakarta
(3) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, DKI Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study applies the Improved Rank Order Centroid (IROC) to the Indonesian patent submission process within a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework. The study evaluates four primary elements in patent assessment: "Patent Description," "Illustration," "Inventor's Ownership Statement," and "Rights Assignment Declaration." Preliminary findings indicate the importance of "Patent Description," followed by the other elements in descending order of significance. The evaluation also encompasses three applicant alternatives, with the Second Applicant emerging as the most favorable. The study further contrasts IROC outcomes with MAGIQ and AHP methodologies. While rank-based techniques like ROC and IROC generally produce similar weight distributions, the AHP method, which employs pairwise comparisons, often displays variations. The research underscores the potential of IROC in determining criterion weights, its comparison within the MAGIQ framework, and its validation through AHP. These insights aim to deepen our understanding of decision-making processes and analysis. The conclusion from comparing IROC results with MAGIQ and AHP indicates that the applicant rankings remain consistent. Therefore, further research is needed to understand the differences between evaluation methods and their impacts and explore the influence of cultural or regional factors in the patent submission process
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
R. R. Purba, M. Mesran, M. T. A. Zaen, S. Setiawansyah, D. Siregar, and E. W. Ambarsari, “Decision Support System in the Best Selection Coffee Shop with TOPSIS Method,” The IJICS (International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science), vol. 7, no. 1, p. 28, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.30865/ijics.v7i1.6157.
A. Arisantoso, M. H. Somaida, M. Sanwasih, and M. I. Shalahudin, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using the WASPAS Method in Webcam Selection Decision Support Systems,” The IJICS (International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science), vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.30865/ijics.v7i1.6001.
J. D. McCaffrey, “Using the Multi-Attribute Global Inference of Quality (MAGIQ) Technique for Software Testing,” in 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, IEEE, 2009, pp. 738–742. doi: 10.1109/ITNG.2009.81.
E. Ambarsari, H. Herlinda, A. Daengs GS, R. Prasetya, and H. Herfina, “Usability of Parental Control Application Features To Protect Children From Negative Internet Impact By Using MAGIQ Approach (Case Study In Indonesia),” in The 1st International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering Technology Universitas Muria Kudus, 2019, pp. 399–405. doi: 10.4108/eai.24-10-2018.2280591.
E. Roszkowska, “Rank Ordering Criteria Weighting Methods – a Comparative Overview,” Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, vol. 5, no. 65, pp. 14–33, 2013, doi: 10.15290/ose.2013.05.65.02.
H. Irwandi, O. S. Sitompul, and S. Sutarman, “K-Means Performance Optimization Using Rank Order Centroid (ROC) And Braycurtis Distance,” SinkrOn, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 472–478, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v7i2.11371.
H. A. Aziz, A. D. Satria Novaldi, and C. Budihartanti, “Application of The Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) & Rank Order Centroid (ROC) Methods in The Selection of Outstanding Students atSMK Al-Huda Sadananya,” JISICOM (Journal of Information System, Informatics and Computing), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.52362/jisicom.v7i1.1073.
S. Parsaoran Tamba, A. Purba, Y. E. Kusuma, M. A. Santi Vidyastuti, and S. Dharma, “Implementation of the Rank Order Centroid (ROC) Method to Determine the Favorite Betta Fish,” JURNAL INFOKUM, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 381–386, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://infor.seaninstitute.org/index.php/infokum/index
U. Hairah and E. Budiman, “Kinerja Metode Rank Sum, Rank Reciprocal dan Rank Order Centroid Menggunakan Referensi Poin Moora (Studi Kasus: Bantuan Kuota Data Internet Untuk Mahasiswa),” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK), vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1129–1136, 2022, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.202294883.
M. A. Hatefi, “An Improved Rank Order Centroid Method (IROC) for Criteria Weight Estimation: An Application in the Engine/Vehicle Selection Problem,” Informatica, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 249–270, 2023, doi: 10.15388/23-INFOR507.
J. Trianto, D. Dartono, R. Nuraini, and H. Rusdianto, “Implementation of Complex Proportional Assessment and Rank Order Centroid Methods for Selecting Delivery Services,” Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 354–363, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.47065/bits.v5i1.3512.
E. Windia Ambarsari, H. Dhika, Juliana, S. Khotijah, and Andri, “Using weighted of ROC in analytical network process for decision making,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1175, p. 012040, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012040.
J. Mantik, S. Nur Asia, and M. Yusuf, “Selection Of Employee Recruitment Based On Priority Sequence Level Assessment Using ROC Method,” Online, 2022.
N. D. Prayoga, M. Zarlis, and S. Efendi, “Weighting comparison analysis ROC and Full consistency Method (FUCOM) on MOORA in decision making,” SinkrOn, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 2024–2032, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v7i3.11643.
V. Rahman, E. Windia Ambarsari, and F. Rastic Andrari, “Pemenuhan Persyaratan Permohonan Paten dengan Metode Multi-Attribute Global Inference of Quality (MAGIQ),” TIN: Terapan Informatika Nusantara, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2023, doi: 10.47065/tin.v4i1.4207.
P. Z. Razi, N. I. Ramli, M. I. Ali, and P. J. Ramadhansyah, “Selection of Best Consultant by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Physics Publishing, Jan. 2020. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/712/1/012016.
M. D. T. P. Nasution et al., “Decision Support Rating System with Analytical Hierarchy Process Method,” International Journal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 7, no. 2.3, pp. 105–108, 2018.
M. Akhrouf and M. Derghoum, “Use of Analytic Hierarchy Process Model for Selection of Health Infrastructure Projects,” International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2023, doi: 10.13033/IJAHP.V15I1.1040.
Y. Yan and C. A. Mercado, “Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Selection of Leaders of Start-up Enterprises,” Indonesian Journal of Economics and Management, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 344–353, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.35313/ijem.v3i2.4707.
C. A. Poveda, “Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making to Assess the Importance of Human Capital in Meeting the Goals and Objectives of Sustainable Development: an Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, vol. 15, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.13033/IJAHP.V15I1.1067.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61944/bids.v2i2.75
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Erlin Windia Ambarsari, Vierhan Rahman, Wahyu Nur Cholifah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science
Asosiasi Peneliti Data Science Indonesia
Email: pdsi.bids@gmail.com
This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.