The Decision Support System Uses the Preference Selection Index Method in Determining Healthy Cooperatives
(1) Accounting Information System, Bandar Lampung
(2) Universitas Pakuan, Bogor
(3) Institut Teknologi Perusahaan Listrik Negara, Jakarta
(4) Parul University, Gujarat
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Determining a healthy cooperative is a challenge that requires attention to several key aspects. Effective management, stable finances, active member involvement, and compliance with laws and regulations are key factors to be considered. By paying attention to all these factors and taking appropriate action, the cooperative can achieve optimal health levels and make a significant contribution to its members as well as the surrounding community. This study aims to determine healthy cooperatives using the Preference Selection Index (PSI) method in determining the best healthy cooperatives using the criteria of Capital, Quality of Productive Assets, Management, Efficiency, Liquidity, Independence, and Cooperative Identity so that the results of the best healthy cooperative ranking recommendations will be able to become recommendations for a decision. Based on the results of the calculation of the final value and ranking of the best healthy cooperatives using the PSI method, rank 1 is Koperasi-02 with a final value of 0.10737, rank 2 is Koperasi-01 with a final value of 0.10029, rank 3 is Koperasi-03 with a final value of 0.05223, rank 4 is Koperasi-04 with a final value of 0.0107. The results of testing using blackbox testing that has been carried out obtained the results of the number of answers from respondents have a value of 100% in accordance with testing the functionality of the system using blackbox testing
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
E. Adamides and N. Karacapilidis, “Information technology for supporting the development and maintenance of open innovation capabilities,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2020.
Z. Zhu, Y. Bai, W. Dai, D. Liu, and Y. Hu, “Quality of e-commerce agricultural products and the safety of the ecological environment of the origin based on 5G Internet of Things technology,” Environ. Technol. Innov., vol. 22, p. 101462, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101462.
S. L. Pan and S. Zhang, “From fighting COVID-19 pandemic to tackling sustainable development goals: An opportunity for responsible information systems research,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 55, p. 102196, 2020.
A. Purmiyati and R. D. Handoyo, “Technical efficiency analysis: Management factor as determinants of saving and credit cooperatives’ health,” J. Co-op. Organ. Manag., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 100186, 2022.
A. Ullah, S. Hussain, A. Wasim, and M. Jahanzaib, “Development of a decision support system for the selection of wastewater treatment technologies,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 731, p. 139158, 2020.
M. Farhadian, P. Shokouhi, and P. Torkzaban, “A decision support system based on support vector machine for diagnosis of periodontal disease,” BMC Res. Notes, vol. 13, pp. 1–6, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05180-5.
H. K. Chan, X. Sun, and S.-H. Chung, “When should fuzzy analytic hierarchy process be used instead of analytic hierarchy process?,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 125, p. 113114, 2019.
F. Psarommatis and D. Kiritsis, “A hybrid Decision Support System for automating decision making in the event of defects in the era of Zero Defect Manufacturing,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 26, p. 100263, 2022.
M. Deveci, A. R. Mishra, I. Gokasar, P. Rani, D. Pamucar, and E. Özcan, “A decision support system for assessing and prioritizing sustainable urban transportation in metaverse,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 475–484, 2022.
R. Torres-Sanchez, H. Navarro-Hellin, A. Guillamon-Frutos, R. San-Segundo, M. C. Ruiz-Abellón, and R. Domingo-Miguel, “A decision support system for irrigation management: Analysis and implementation of different learning techniques,” Water, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 548, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020548.
Z. Zhai, J. F. Martínez, V. Beltran, and N. L. Martínez, “Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 170, p. 105256, 2020.
J. S. Mboli, D. Thakker, and J. L. Mishra, “An Internet of Things‐enabled decision support system for circular economy business model,” Softw. Pract. Exp., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 772–787, 2022.
S. Setiawansyah, “Kombinasi Pembobotan PIPRECIA-S dan Metode SAW dalam Pemilihan Ketua Organisasi Sekolah,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 32–40, 2023.
M. Kayacık, H. Dinçer, and S. Yüksel, “Using quantum spherical fuzzy decision support system as a novel sustainability index approach for analyzing industries listed in the stock exchange,” Borsa Istanbul Rev., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1145–1157, 2022.
R. R. Purba, M. Mesran, M. T. A. Zaen, S. Setiawansyah, D. Siregar, and E. W. Ambarsari, “Decision Support System in the Best Selection Coffee Shop with TOPSIS Method,” IJICS (International J. Informatics Comput. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2023.
F.-M. Toma, “A hybrid neuro-experimental decision support system to classify overconfidence and performance in a simulated bubble using a passive BCI,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 212, p. 118722, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118722.
Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.
A. Bilbao-Terol and C. Bilbao-Terol, “The Choquet integral supported by a hedonic approach for modelling preferences in hotel selection,” Omega, p. 102971, 2023.
H. Jalota, P. K. Mandal, M. Thakur, and G. Mittal, “A novel approach to incorporate investor’s preference in fuzzy multi-objective portfolio selection problem using credibility measure,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 212, p. 118583, 2023.
M. Amin, N. Irawati, H. D. E. Sinaga, D. Retnosari, J. Maulani, and H. D. L. Raja, “Decision support system analysis for selecting a baby cream product with Preference Selection Index (PSI) Baby Sensitive Skin under 3 Year,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1933, no. 1, p. 12035.
T. Singh, S. Tejyan, A. Patnaik, R. Chauhan, and G. Fekete, “Optimal design of needlepunched nonwoven fiber reinforced epoxy composites using improved preference selection index approach,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 7583–7591, 2020.
S. Sundari, M. N. Fadli, D. Hartama, A. P. Windarto, and A. Wanto, “Decision Support System on Selection of Lecturer Research Grant Proposals using Preferences Selection Index,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1255, no. 1, p. 12006.
D. T. Do and N.-T. Nguyen, “Investigation of the Appropriate data normalization method for combination with preference selection index method in MCDM,” Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl., 2022.
D. H. Tien, D. D. Trung, N. Van Thien, and N.-T. Nguyen, “Multi-objective optimization of the cylindrical grinding process of scm440 steel using preference selection index method,” J. Mach. Eng., vol. 21, 2021.
A. Sutrisno and V. Kumar, “Supply chain sustainability risk decision support model using integrated Preference Selection Index (PSI) method and prospect theory,” J. Adv. Manag. Res., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 316–346, 2022.
Andris Silitonga and Dyah Ayu Megawaty, “Decision Support System Feasibility for Promotion using the Profile Matching Method,” J. Data Sci. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 2 SE-Articles, pp. 50–56, May 2023, doi: 10.58602/dimis.v1i2.46.
A. F. O. Pasaribu and A. D. Wahyudi, “Used Car Sale Application Design in Car Shoowroom Using Extreme Programming,” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2023.
S. Setiawansyah, H. Sulistiani, and V. H. Saputra, “Penerapan Codeigniter Dalam Pengembangan Sistem Pembelajaran Dalam Jaringan Di SMK 7 Bandar Lampung,” J. CoreIT J. Has. Penelit. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 89–95, 2020.
S. K. Mahapatra and A. Satapathy, “Parametric analysis of erosion wear of sponge iron slag-filled ramie–epoxy composites using Taguchi and preference selection index methods,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng., p.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61944/bids.v2i2.72
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Heni Sulistiani, Sufiatul Maryana, Pritasari Palupiningsih, Abhishek Mehta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science
Asosiasi Peneliti Data Science Indonesia
Email: pdsi.bids@gmail.com
This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.